Wednesday, December 17, 2008

On good monaural sound

Andrew Lutes just said @andrew_levine Personally, I love mono. I love surround too but mono seems to get right to the point. I feel so too, if it is _good_ mono, meaning the sound is...
  • Based on a good mix
  • Intelligible
  • Wide dynamic range
  • Wide bandwidth
The issue is that you can only get that by design. You can not e.g. condense two tracks based on runtime-stereophony to mono without comb-filtering intruding. You have to work with good material to start with and then carefully craft the mix, and then all will be well :-)

Friday, December 12, 2008

Making a better latte

Expanding and refining my 11 steps to a fine latte...

Go for a double. Making a double-shot really is much easier than preparing a single. I think it's due mainly to the larger basket that masks any inaccuracies when dosing. Also, with the Rancilio Silvia and baskets by Lamarzocco (Rancilio's single does not work for me), it is easier to tighten the portafilter using the double-shot basket.

These are my usual steps:
  • Make sure the machine is heated up well
  • Press the steam switch
  • Fill a large (250 ml) cup with milk nearly halfway
  • Let out steam until it comes out dry, but don't let the lamp go off
  • Stretch the milk to the top
  • Depress the steam switch
  • Sink the wand and heat the milk thoroughly
  • Bump the cup to get rid of larger bubbles
  • Wipe the steam wand clean
  • Insert the portafilter into the (doser-less) grinder
  • Test the brewgroup to see if the temperature is right (no extreme steaming)
  • Dose into the portafilter
  • Tamp well
  • Brew the shot (about 27 sec for 30/60 ml - single/double)
  • Old - Pour it through the milk
  • Old - Rinse the shot glass with some extra hot water
  • Clean the group head, basket & portafilter
  • Enjoy
I have now found that the result is _much_ better when steaming the milk in a steaming pitcher and pouring the result onto the espresso, brewed into the preheated cup. Now I can enjoy my single-shot as much as one half of a double shot. Surprising but replicable.

BTW, I very much enjoy my Ilsa Anniversario lattiera. It makes steaming even more fun.

Monday, December 08, 2008

Someone did invent Stereo

We take the stereophonic listening experience, with images between two loudspeakers and it's convincing illusion of width and depth for granted, but it has been used commercially for less than fifty years. It is also very interesting to note that many of the advancements in this area were fuelled by motion pictures. People were seen to move from left to right, and the sound should match. Sound is understood as an enveloping experience, and --simplifying a bit-- along comes Surround...
  • 1857
    Monaural sound is first transcribed by Édouard-Léon Scott de Martinville
  • 1877
    Thomas Edison's phonograph cylinder enables the recording & playback of sound
  • 1880
    Stereophonic sound, realized by Clément Ader, has a cursory appearance
  • 1930
    Binaural Sound is studied in depth by Alan Dower Blumlein and Arthur C. Keller
  • 1960
    The age of Stereo begins
  • 1970
    RCA Records introduces Quadraphonic sound
  • 1970
    Michael Gerzon extends on Blumlein's work with the development of Ambisonics
  • 1970
    Walter Murch thinks up 5.1-Surround for "Apocalypse Now"
Alan Dower Blumlein, born on June 29, 1903 in Hampstead, London, invented two out of the three "pure" techniques for recording sound in stereo [stereos = "solid" and phōnē = "sound"]: XY (subsuming the special case of the Blumlein-configuration) and M/S. Both are termed coincident stereophony because the capsules of the two microphones involved are located at (about) the same spot. Blumlein's work has a profound influence on Michael Gerzon who developed Ambisonics as a followup to Quadraphonics.

The third traditional approach to recording in stereo, AB-stereophonics, is based not on differences in the sound pressure level of signals reaching the two microphones but rather on differences in time-of arrival (or the "runtime" or phase) of the signals. It was developed at Bell Labs by Arthur C. Keller under the supervision of Dr. Harvey Fletcher. Stokowski was delighted: ''Listening monaurally,'' he reported to Bell Laboratories, ''gives me the sensation of the music being choked and crushed together. Binaurally (i.e., in stereo) the music sounds free, spacious, and the choked sensation is gone." [Link]

Coincident and runtime-based configurations give rise to near-coincident techniques, one of the most mentionable being ORTF, developed by and named for the Office de Radiodiffusion Télévision Française.

5.1 for Apocalypse Now?

Movie-sound before the 1970's mainly utilized stereo, plus an effects channel at the rear of the audience. Walter Murch wanted to be able to spread the rear ambience to better enfold the listeners. And then there was the matter of the voiceovers...

The target of "Apocalypse Now", big movie theaters, were not suited for Quadraphonic playback. With stereo there is a more or less defined sweet spot in the center between the two speakers. If the voice of the actors or a disembodied voiceover came from the phantom-middle, that is if it were mixed into the front left and front right stream in equal parts, it would appear to come from the side the audience were located on. Members of the the audience on the far left would hear the voice coming from there. Placing a center speaker behind and in the middle of the big screen anchors the voice to that position more firmly.

The establishment of this setup as a mainstream commodity doesn't mean recordings have to be made with an explicit 5.1-mapping though. But this is (yet) another topic, to be discussed soon :-)

[Thanks to the Wikipedia & Steven Schoenherr]

[100204 - Quadraphonic sound came before Ambisonics]

Friday, December 05, 2008

Analysis - Erleuchtung garantiert

The Geman movie Erleuchtung Garantiert (Enlightenment Guaranteed) by Dorris Dörrie features Solweig Bores as the sound designer and Chris Price (I) as "sound"-person.

I was positively surprised by it's nice rich 5.1 ambience that did have a very real and unpolished feel to it. And this in a movie that uses quite a lot of camcorder-imagery. Have a listen!